loading...
The Kindle bookshop is filling up with automatically generated spam, as Laura Miller writes in Spamazon on Salon, following up on a Reuters article about the same problem.
Cobbling miscellaneous content together, Miller writes, “it’s possible to “publish” as many as 10 Kindle ebooks per day”.
British marketer Mike Essex… found… nearly 3,000 99-cent e-books “created” by one Manuel Ortiz Braschi. Braschi is purportedly the author of “Canvas Painting 101,” “40 Ways to Prevent or Get Rid of Stretch Marks,” and “Seven Days to Profitable Blogging”…
Spam hurts all self-publishers
This is bad news for self-publishers for a number of reasons
- Some buyers are so pissed off they’ve said in reviews that they won’t buy an ebook again
- Spam clogs the system, making it hard to find the real books
- “Many self-publishers set their prices low to encourage ebook buyers to take a chance on their titles, and ebook spam could end up discrediting the entire field of 99-cent books“
- A proliferation of junk ebooks might contribute to a view that “all writing can be regarded a freely exploitable resource”, i.e. a view that it’s all right to steal writers’ work (ebook, blog content, etc.) and package it up to sell for 99 cents

Ernie Zelinski, whose copyright I've infringed by borrowing this picture but who, I hope, will forgive me
Should authors be compensated by Amazon?
The article quotes Ernie Zelinski, who has commented before on this blog (hello, Ernie).
Ernie found some of his titles had been “published” on the Kindle by one Mingfeng Lai. He told Salon it took Amazon a fortnight to take the titles down.
The delay is one thing but, as Ernie argued to Miller:
- Amazon has still made a 65% commission of on the sales of the copyright-infringing books
- The illegitimate copies of his book are still on people’s Kindles, although Amazon has the capability to remove them
“Amazon has earned money from my copyrighted material that shouldn’t have been on their system,” Ernie says in Salon. “To me, this is totally wrong and definitely not a sign of a company that operates with integrity and decency.”
(Mingfeng Lai, incidentally, also wrote The Great Gatsby, according to Amazon.)
I agree that Amazon should be doing more to put this right.
By removing the offending titles, Amazon has indicated it’s satisfied they did infringe Ernie’s copyright so it knows it’s profited from a copyright infringement.
At the very least they should be taking the royalties they’ve credited to Mingfeng Lai and crediting them to Ernie. And, if they can’t take Mingfeng Lai’s share (or that of any other infringer) because the usurper taken the money and run, Amazon should be paying Ernie and any other victim from the 65% Amazon collected for itself from the transactions.
Neither the infringing publisher nor the bookseller should be profiting from this at the author’s expense.
What do you think?
Rise above the noise
Learn how to use the Kindle’s built-in features to give your book’s word-of-mouth marketing a boost. In-Book Promotion shows you how to use the Kindle’s free features to get readers recommending your books.
loading...
















